The Global Search for Education: What Germany Did

Posted by: C.M. Rubin, The Global Search for Education

July 3rd, 2015

Tagged with:

The Global Search for Education (GSE) is a regular contributor to the Edmodo Blog. Authored by C. M Rubin, GSE brings together distinguished thought leaders in education and innovation from around the world to explore the key learning issues faced by today’s nations. Look for a new post every Friday and join the Global Search for Education Community on Edmodo to share your perspectives with their editorial staff.

2014-02-24-cmrubinworldPISAPICTURE4500-thumbGermany’s poor performance in the 2000 PISA test surprised and concerned the relevant stakeholders in that country. By 2012, scores in mathematics, reading, and science were above the OECD average.

The Program for International Student Assessment (PISA), a triennial international survey, aims to evaluate education systems worldwide by testing the skills and knowledge of 15-year-old students. To date, students representing more than 70 economies have participated in the assessment.

Importantly, Germany is one of only three countries that improved in both mathematics performance and equity since 2003. Additionally, Germany’s significant improvements in mathematics performance between 2006 and 2009 were largely the result of better performance among low-achieving and disadvantaged students.

Elfriede Ohrnberger, Ministerialrätin of the Bavarian State Ministry of Education, joined The Global Search for Education to discuss what Germany did.

Congratulations on Germany’s success in the 2012 PISA test. Was improving your students test results in the PISA exam important to you and why?

Laudatio Ohrnberger

After the rather disappointing results for Germany in the first PISA test in the year 2000, the continuing improvement in all the test domains, as well as the improvements for specific student groups, have been recognized and appreciated warmly.

On one hand, politicians and school administration could assume that the measures that had been taken after the release of the first PISA results were adequate and focused on the relevant areas.

On the other hand, the results that were above the OECD average in the PISA 2012 test could also be interpreted as good feedback to the schools—students, teachers, principals and the parents—that their efforts were necessary and successful.

To what do you attribute your success?

German media reported the results of the first PISA test and added comments by journalists, scientists and relevant stakeholders describing these results as a PISA shock for Germany. But Germany took this as a salutary lesson.

After the release of the first PISA results, the Standing Conference of the Ministers of Education and Cultural Affairs of the 16 Länder named seven areas in which the Länder and the Standing Conference of the Ministers of Education and Cultural Affairs would become active (in Germany, it is the Länder—the States of Germany—that are responsible for educational affairs):

  1. Measures to improve linguistic competence as soon as early childhood education.
  1. Measures to strengthen the link between the early childhood sector and primary school with the aim of an early school entry.
  1. Measures for the improvement of primary education and the continuous improvement of reading literacy and basic understanding of mathematical and scientific concepts.
  1. Measures for efficient support of educationally disadvantaged children with particular regard to children and young people with a migrant background.
  1. Measures to thoroughly develop and assure the quality of teaching and schools on the basis of binding educational standards and result-oriented evaluation.
  1. Measures to improve professionalism in teaching with particular regard to diagnostic and methodical competence as an element of systematic school development.
  1. Measures to expand provision of all-day activities and care with the aim of increasing opportunities for education and support, with particular regard to pupils with educational deficits and to especially gifted pupils.

The Länder have implemented concepts/strategies to realize these measures. The measures mark the frame and indicate the aims, but due to their responsibility for educational affairs, each Länder decides on its own about the adequate strategy or concept to be applied. In certain cases, some Länder also follow similar strategies.

2014-02-24-cmrubinworldPISAPICTURE5500-thumbCan you briefly explain some of the strategies you used to accomplish your education goals?

In June 2002, the Ministers of Education and Cultural Affairs adopted a resolution to introduce Bildungsstandards (educational standards) binding for all Länder. In 2003 and 2004, educational standards were adopted for the primary sector, the Hauptschulabschluss and the Mittlerer Schulabschluss (secondary school programs). In October 2012, the Standing Conference, on the basis of a decision of October 2007, has resolved educational standards for the Allgemeine Hochschulreife (general higher education entrance qualification) in German and Mathematics and in follow-on courses in the foreign languages of English and French.

In June 2006, the Standing Conference adopted a comprehensive strategy for educational monitoring which consists of four interconnected areas:

  1. Participation in international comparative studies of pupil achievement.
  1. Central review of the achievement of educational standards in a comparison between the Länder.
  1. Comparative studies within the Länder in order to review the efficiency of individual schools.
  1. The joint education reporting of the Federation and the Länder.

The evaluation of research and teaching has been provided for in the higher education sector since the amendment to the Framework Act for Higher Education.

The evaluation of study courses and subjects is also established in the higher education legislation of most Länder. In a resolution of March 2002, the Standing Conference laid down the future development of quality assurance for all Länder and institutions of higher education; in the long-term, this should lead to an overall concept for quality assurance, taking account of all types of higher education institutions and all study courses. With the introduction of the accreditation of study courses, the setting up of the Accreditation Council, the foundation of accreditation agencies and the adoption of joint structural requirements for all Länder for Bachelor’s and Master’s study courses, standards and procedures were established for the teaching sector. These should provide students and employers with reliable orientation and create transparency in international cooperation with regard to the study offer and study qualifications in Germany.

In September 2005, the Standing Conference of the Ministers of Education and Cultural Affairs of the Länder passed a comprehensive quality assurance framework concept for teaching.

The 2004 Standards for Teacher Training in the Educational Sciences and the December 2008 edition of the common content requirements for subject-related studies and subject-related didactics in teacher training, which apply to all Länder, serve as the basis for the accreditation and evaluation of teacher-training courses.

In October 2003, the Standing Conference first published a report on the education system in Germany, “Education Report for Germany: First Findings,” which mainly focuses on schools providing general education. The first joint education report of the Federation and the Länder, “Education in Germany,” which mainly focuses on education and migration, was presented in 2006. The second national education report concentrates on the transition from school into vocational education and training, higher education, and the labour market, and was presented in June 2008. The third national Education Report, presented in June 2010, was devoted primarily to “perspectives of education in demographic change.”

Teenagers conducting an experiment in a chemistry laboratory

What can the rest of the world learn from your experience?

We do not want to claim that others shall “learn” from us, but we will be happy to share our experience. In Germany, the Länder responsible for educational affairs have agreed on necessary measures and have made their implementation a joint enterprise. It has also been a good experience that due to the rather disappointing results in the first PISA test, there has been a broad consensus in society that we must try to implement these measures.

What are the next steps for the German education system, given your achievements so far?

We will try hard to maintain the achievements reached so far, which can not be taken for granted, as an analysis of the results of the last PISA test shows.

We will go on trying to improve the development of each individual’s potential. We will continue our efforts to reduce the differences in achievement of students with and without an immigration background, and of boys and girls and of students coming from different social backgrounds.

Continue the conversation in the Global Search for Education Community on Edmodo



C.M. Rubin and Elfriede Ohrnberger


C.M. Rubin is the author of two widely read online series for which she received a 2011 Upton Sinclair award, “The Global Search for Education” and “How Will We Read?” She is also the author of three bestselling books, including The Real Alice in Wonderland, is the publisher of CMRubinWorld, and is a Disruptor Foundation Fellow.

(All photos courtesy of OECD/PISA and Elfriede Ohrnberger)



5 responses to “The Global Search for Education: What Germany Did”

  1. Alexa Minett says:

    I think it’s great that the German government worked WITH schools and educators to come up with a plan for success. That is how it should be, rather than being in opposition to them.

  2. Jodie Johnston says:

    I love that they focus more on developing and maintaining early childhood education. We are so very test focused in America. I enjoyed the article.

  3. Vanessa Tarrant says:

    It is clear that Germany has identified, singled out and applied strategies to address the areas that were lacking. They are also right to identify that this is not a quick fix but one that will take time and will need to eve love as education changes.

  4. One point of interest is that this was a process that spanned several years. Unfortunately it appears that in New York State, changes are being made for the educators and the students that appear to be made immediately without a roll out plan. Panic isn’t a good motivator, especially since it usually involves a knee-jerk response.

  5. Andrea says:

    I think this is a great example of how education has to be tackled from different angles and it has to involve a whole community of people.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *